Because that often-repeated narrative has come out of the discoveries of modern science, it seems so scientific, so objective. Unlike ancient cultures' imaginative creation stories with their own messages to tell, the modern scientifically-based narrative gives the appearance of being just facts, not prejudiced by human desires. Often overlooked, however, is one critical way in which that modern scientific narrative is unconsciously shaped by a human bias.
Think about it: Why is that story of our universe, which begins with the Big Bang, always told with life on planet Earth as the outcome of its narrative? Why is it told as a chain of events leading to the development of planet Earth? A narrative could be constructed just as scientifically that would lead to planet X in galaxy Y, or to planet Z circling around one of many other suns in a different solar system. The actual history of the universe is that of countless causes-and-effects scattering throughout the cosmos in innumerable directions. Multiple chronologies, not just the one that leads to our home planet.
Thus analyzed, that often-repeated narrative about the universe that modern science has made possible reveals itself to be not totally objective. But that is just as well. After all, what meaning could it bring to us if we did not follow the thread of the story that leads to life on Earth and even to us? The scientists who tell our modern story of the universe have thus revealed themselves to be not just scientists but also narrative-makers -- storytellers! They have thus engaged in an ancient art.
Narratives are not simply an imaginative form of art. They can also be sources of knowledge. We humans can comprehend the world when we isolate threads that form a narrative. The modern theologian John Haught speaks to this point when he writes:
"For human subjects the world is not experienced, at least in a rich or interesting way, apart from stories.... There is a narrative quality to all of our experience, and it is from stories, whether mythic or historical, that we acquire any sense or reality at all."
Looked at in still another way, one message of modern science's story of the universe is that out of the universe have emerged, of all things, storytellers!
~~~
Has your life been a story? How?
(The Haught quotation is from Is Nature Enough?
Meaning and Truth in the Age of Science, by John F. Haught. © 2006. p. 46.)
2 comments:
My life has been a story. But I have been able to untangle some of its
threads only by looking back on it from the present.
Thank you for the beautiful picture.
I would assert that most scientists do not care, in particular, that the narrative leads to earth. In fact, I think most scientists (or at least evolutionary biologists, astronomers, physicists, ecologists, or botanists) focus less on the place of humans in the narrative than they do on other creatures, planets, etc. However we have found that people like to be the main characters, even the heroes, in their stories. If you, as a scientist, are unable to relate your research to humans, then you are sunk. You will not get funding. You will do not more research. Scientists are actively asked to make their work more relatable to humans, to turn their research narrative into a human-interest story. This, then, is not a commentary on scientific bias, but on humanity and our desire to be the star in a cosmic story.
I consider this a major obstacle because, as this post pointed out, there are "multiple chronologies, not just the one that leads to our home planet." Our inability to view ourselves in our rightful place - as a single outcome in God's magnificent universe, not higher nor lower than any other living thing - has fueled our greed and ignorance. Because of this we have citizens who do not accept the science of climate change or macroevolution. These ideas threaten the erroneous conclusion that humans are the center, if not the goal, of creation.
Post a Comment