Given these associations with solidity, there is irony in that in the late 1700's, stones became associated with change -- immense change! So much so that people felt that the stability of human existence was crumbling. In the late 1700's, the Scottish geologist James Hutton developed the principle that geological features of landscapes, even as immense and striking as they sometimes can be, had come about through slow geological changes over an immense amount of time. The shocking message of the stones was that, viewed from a wide perspective, they had been forever changing. Moreover, the message in some of those stones -- fossils -- was that there had been forms of life long before human history.
Today, a couple centuries later, most people have accepted that our human history is but a tiny piece of an immense cosmic timeline. A timeline so incomprehensible that we have to use abstract numbers or metaphors (such as a 24-hour cosmic clock) to try to grasp it. Our human urge to connect with life encourages us to bring this matter of immense time down to a level we can relate to. Down to a level we can hold and touch and feel. That is what a small fossil can do!
I remember when, as a child, I first had a fossil explained to me. I do not recall what type of tiny animal the fossil was an imprint of. But I do remember how, as I held the hard stone and examined the small shape, I felt as if I were holding not an imprint but the skeleton of the animal itself.
John Muir (1838-1914) |
~~~
Do you remember when you learned about fossils? Is there some fossil you particularly recall?
(The photograph of the fossils is by cobalt123 and is used under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license.)